TLDR
- Lilly drops 3.8% as FDA pushes orforglipron decision to Q2 2026
- Fast-track promise tested as safety questions override speed goals
- Sanofi and Disc Medicine also hit by review delays over risk concerns
- Voucher program shows limits as FDA prioritizes data over deadlines
- Obesity drug optimism cools amid tougher U.S. regulatory scrutiny
Eli Lilly (LLY) stock fell sharply after the FDA extended the review period for its oral obesity drug orforglipron, and the move signaled fresh uncertainty around the agency’s new fast-track framework. The delay added pressure to the program created to speed decisions for selected medicines, yet the agency paused several reviews due to safety concerns. The stock closed at $1,032.97, down 3.76%, and the broader sector reacted to the unexpected regulatory slowdown.
FDA Extends Orforglipron Review Timeline
The FDA moved the target action date for orforglipron to April 10, 2026, and the shift replaced the earlier accelerated schedule. The program initially aimed to cut several months from review times, yet agency scientists raised issues that required more analysis. confirmed that approval may now fall in the second quarter based on updated guidance.
The delay followed the fast-track designation granted through the Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher program, and leaders had previously pushed for a quicker verdict. The drug remained a key part of Lilly’s broader obesity portfolio, and the extended timeline introduced new regulatory hurdles. Lilly continued coordinating with the agency as the assessment advanced.
The new voucher program selected medicines considered nationally significant, and it sought to speed regulatory clearance by reducing review windows to one or two months. The latest developments showed the FDA adjusting timelines when questions emerged about data strength or safety. The agency’s decision highlighted its willingness to slow evaluations despite political attention on the new process.
Other Selected Drugs Also Face Regulatory Delays
Sanofi’s type 1 diabetes therapy Tzield also encountered a longer review period after the FDA identified adverse events requiring further scrutiny. The extension followed reports of seizure, blood clotting, and a patient death, though the cause remained under investigation. The stall pushed the decision date back by more than one month.
Disc Medicine’s bitopertin for porphyria experienced a two-week delay as reviewers raised concerns about efficacy evidence and the drug’s potential for misuse. The concerns prompted additional examination of trial data before the agency could issue a final decision. The company continued engaging with regulators to address outstanding questions.
Boehringer Ingelheim’s lung cancer drug zongertinib also remained under extended review, and a decision is now expected in mid-February. The FDA did not disclose the reason for the shift, yet the agency confirmed that timelines may adjust as needed. This extension added to a pattern of revised schedules affecting multiple fast-track selections.
Program Background and Ongoing Scrutiny
The Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher program began in 2025, aiming to expedite the review processes for strategically important drugs. The initiative promised swift evaluations for medicines tied to unmet needs, domestic production, or pricing commitments. However, the latest delays demonstrated that scientific concerns continue to override compressed deadlines.
The agency assigned 18 drugs to the program across several cycles, and most reviews will begin in 2026 and beyond. Only one drug has been approved to date under the new system and several remain in early development stages. Consequently, regulatory specialists noted that the program still faces operational challenges during its rollout.
The recent setbacks reinforced that the FDA will pause reviews when safety or performance questions arise, even under accelerated pathways. The developments placed additional attention on how the agency balances rapid access and rigorous oversight. Therefore, Lilly’s revised timeline underscored the shifting expectations around fast-track drug evaluation in the United States.


