Key Takeaways
- Eric Trump accused JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo of being “anti-American” for opposing stablecoin interest payments
- Traditional banks offer customers 0.01–0.05% interest while receiving approximately 3.65% from Federal Reserve funds
- Cryptocurrency companies are seeking to provide 4–5%+ returns on stablecoins via bills including the Clarity Act
- JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon argued that stablecoin providers paying interest should face bank-level regulatory requirements
- Patrick Witt, White House digital assets advisor, rejected Dimon’s position, stating that yield payments alone don’t warrant banking regulations
Eric Trump went on the offensive against leading American financial institutions this week, claiming they’re actively working to prevent U.S. citizens from accessing better returns through cryptocurrency-based stablecoins.
In a Wednesday statement posted to X, Trump specifically named JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo. He claimed these institutions are fighting consumer benefits to preserve their profit structures.
Trump highlighted the disparity between customer deposit rates and what financial institutions earn from the Federal Reserve. According to his statement, banks compensate depositors with annual yields ranging from just 0.01% to 0.05%, while receiving roughly 3.65% on their Federal Reserve deposits.
He contended that cryptocurrency services now pose a threat to this business model by preparing to deliver stablecoin returns of 4% to 5% or higher. Trump alleged banks are attempting to prevent this through legislative pressure.
According to Trump, the American Banking Association alongside other industry groups are investing substantial resources to limit these yields via the Clarity Act. He characterized this campaign as “anti-retail, anti-consumer, and straight-up anti-American.”
Eric Trump serves as co-founder of World Liberty Financial, the company behind the USD1 stablecoin. The organization is additionally pursuing a banking charter from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The Trump family’s connection to World Liberty Financial has generated scrutiny. Questions about possible conflicts of interest have emerged considering President Donald Trump’s influence over cryptocurrency regulations.
Traditional Banking Sector Raises Concerns About Stablecoin Interest
Banking institutions have contended that permitting stablecoin providers to pay interest might cause substantial deposit outflows from conventional financial entities. They maintain this scenario could generate systemic financial risks.
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon commented on the matter earlier this week. He stated that stablecoin issuers offering interest on holdings should comply with identical regulatory frameworks as traditional banks.
“If you’re going to be holding balances and paying interest, that’s a bank. You should be regulated like a bank,” Dimon said.
Administration Digital Assets Official Challenges Banking Position
Patrick Witt, who leads the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, challenged Dimon’s characterization. He argued that connecting stablecoin interest payments to bank-style regulation misrepresents the fundamental issues.
Witt explained the critical factor isn’t whether platforms distribute yields, but rather whether they engage in lending or rehypothecation of the backing assets. He stated these activities necessitate banking oversight, not simply paying returns to holders.
President Donald Trump also addressed the Clarity Act on Tuesday via social media, urging Congressional action on the legislation. He expressed comparable critiques regarding banks obstructing the stablecoin components.
Donald Trump’s statement followed his meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong. Armstrong had publicly retracted his endorsement of the bill in January, expressing reservations about stablecoin language and additional legislative provisions.
The White House has been facilitating discussions between conventional financial players and cryptocurrency companies to bridge their differences. Currently, no final compromise has been achieved regarding the stablecoin yield question.


