TLDR
- Hims stock sinks after launching a $49 semaglutide pill and sparking legal fire
- Novo Nordisk threatens action, calling Hims’ pill unsafe and unlawful copy
- Cheap oral GLP-1 offer intensifies pressure across obesity drug leaders
- Compounded pills fuel market tension as regulators face rising scrutiny
- Weight-loss drug race heats up as Lilly prepares rival oral treatment
Hims & Hers (HIMS) stock fell sharply after the telehealth company revealed a low-cost semaglutide pill and triggered a swift legal threat. The stock traded at $23.16 and dropped 5.08% as the session showed persistent weakness. Market focus shifted quickly toward Novo Nordisk, which warned of legal action and raised concerns about product safety.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc., HIMS
Novo Nordisk Responds as Competitive Pressure Builds
Novo Nordisk announced plans to pursue legal and regulatory action because it claimed Hims introduced an unlawful copy of its new Wegovy pill. The company argued that Hims engaged in mass compounding and created safety risks, and it highlighted potential quality concerns. Novo also emphasized its proprietary SNAC absorption technology, and it noted gaps in Hims’ explanation of its pill’s delivery method.
Shares of Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly both dropped about 7% after the announcement, and the decline reflected renewed competitive tension. The move added pressure on the fast-growing weight-loss drug segment, and it raised questions about near-term demand trends. Novo continued expanding its obesity franchise, and it recently launched the Wegovy pill in the United States with strong early adoption.
Novo confirmed that more than 170,000 people had begun using the approved pill, and the rapid uptake supported earlier projections. However, the company signaled that compounded copies threatened its brand strategy, and it warned about possible market confusion. Novo also referenced earlier disputes with Hims, and it ended a prior collaboration due to marketing concerns.
Hims Expands Its Compounding Strategy With New Oral Offering
Hims moved ahead with its plan to provide a compounded semaglutide pill, and it positioned the product as a personalized treatment. The company set the starting cost at $49 and planned a rise to $99 after the first month. It also stated that the formulation differed from approved versions, and it offered flexibility for users avoiding needles.
Hims expanded beyond injectable compounded semaglutide, and the shift marked a broader product strategy within the telehealth platform. The company said providers could tailor doses and adjust plans, and it described the oral pill as a daily treatment. Demand for weight-loss options remained high, and telehealth platforms continued playing a larger role in distribution.
The company also argued that U.S. compounding rules allowed personalized products, and it pointed to alternative formulations as legal grounds. The approach targeted unmet demand created by high prices and supply limits, and it aimed to capture cost-sensitive users. Hims maintained that its delivery system protected the active ingredient, and it sought to distance its product from earlier disputes.
Competitive Landscape Shifts as Regulatory Scrutiny Intensifies
Compounding pharmacies continued to attract attention as they expanded offerings during branded drug shortages, and the growth reshaped the GLP-1 market. These pharmacies supplied lower-cost alternatives, and they gained traction even after supply stabilized. Their presence affected Novo most, and it recently projected slower growth partly due to the expanded compounding sector.
Analysts noted that the oral segment remained uncertain, and they highlighted differences between approved and compounded formulations. They also outlined how absorption levels could vary, and they warned about unpredictable side-effect patterns. Analysts estimated compounded GLP-1 prescriptions at about one million annually, and this compared with far higher totals across branded franchises from Novo and Lilly.
Lilly prepared to introduce its own oral GLP-1 pill pending regulatory review, and it targeted a launch later this year. The move intensified competition, and it added pressure to maintain share in a fast-expanding market. The legal backdrop around compounding continued evolving, and it now shaped strategies across leading pharmaceutical companies.


