TLDRs;
- Japanese carmakers turn to new battery technologies as Chinese firms dominate global EV supply chains.
- Suzuki to adopt safer LFP batteries, while Honda doubles down on higher-performance NCM cells.
- Japan’s limited LFP production capacity raises concerns about sourcing, cost, and supply chain stability.
- New battery recycling rules by 2026 could reshape Japan’s EV ecosystem and attract startups.
Japanese automakers are ramping up efforts to innovate in battery technology as they face stiff competition from Chinese electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers.
The global EV race, once centered on performance, has now evolved into a battle for battery supremacy, a crucial factor determining cost, range, and sustainability.
Batteries account for roughly one-third of an EV’s total production cost and directly influence its range and lifespan. With Chinese battery makers such as BYD and CATL commanding nearly 70% of global battery installations, Japan’s automotive industry is under mounting pressure to secure competitive and reliable alternatives.
Suzuki and Honda Take Divergent Battery Paths
Suzuki Motor Corporation is taking a pragmatic approach by adopting lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries for its upcoming e-Vitara SUV, set to launch in January. LFP batteries, widely used in China, are praised for their durability, safety, and lower cost. However, their lower energy density means shorter driving ranges compared to nickel-rich chemistries.
Despite these limitations, Suzuki’s strategy reflects a shift toward affordability and mass-market accessibility. The company aims to position the e-Vitara as a practical EV option for urban consumers seeking reliability over performance.
In contrast, Honda Motor Co. is pursuing performance-driven battery solutions. The automaker’s N-ONE e: minivehicle uses nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) cells, achieving a range of 295 kilometers, the longest for its class in Japan. Honda’s decision underscores its focus on efficiency and technological refinement, even at higher material costs.
Meanwhile, AESC, a major Japanese battery supplier, noted that improved cell layouts have significantly enhanced LFP performance, hinting at future design optimizations that could narrow the gap between affordability and endurance.
Supply Chain Uncertainty Clouds Japan’s LFP Future
Despite renewed innovation, Japan’s domestic LFP battery ecosystem remains underdeveloped. Who will supply LFP cells for Suzuki’s e-Vitara remains unspecified, raising concerns about dependency on foreign imports.
Adding to the uncertainty, Nissan recently scrapped its planned 5 GWh LFP plant in Kitakyushu, originally set for 2028, citing economic pressures despite receiving up to €340 million in government subsidies. The cancellation, which affected around 500 jobs, highlights Japan’s struggle to build local manufacturing resilience amid shrinking margins.
As of 2025, Japan lacks a confirmed major LFP producer, leaving automakers to rely heavily on joint ventures or Chinese imports, potentially exposing them to geopolitical risks and price fluctuations.
Recycling Gaps and Emerging Opportunities
Japan’s lack of a unified battery recycling framework further complicates its EV ambitions. According to AESC’s Noda, the country currently has no comprehensive system for collecting used batteries, an omission that may drive up costs and hinder sustainability goals as EV adoption grows.
However, this gap is also spurring opportunities. Startups and recyclers are stepping in to create battery tracking systems and reverse logistics networks for second-life storage solutions. These systems aim to repurpose used EV batteries into stationary energy storage, enhancing sustainability while reducing waste.
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) plans to designate lithium-ion batteries as “specified recyclable products” from April 2026, compelling manufacturers to collect and recycle them through retail channels. For forward-thinking companies, this regulatory shift presents a strategic window to build partnerships with automakers and battery suppliers before compliance deadlines take effect.