Key Takeaways
- Democratic lawmakers in the House unveiled the Banning Games on Deaths and Elections Act, seeking to prohibit event contracts related to elections, armed conflict, and mortality on platforms including Polymarket and Kalshi.
- In a parallel effort, Sen. Adam Schiff and Rep. Mike Levin presented the DEATH BETS Act, which would ban identical contract categories under commodity exchange regulations.
- Investigations revealed insider trading activity where one individual generated $553,000 in profit from wagering on an Iranian leader’s potential assassination.
- Approximately $500 million in bets were placed on when U.S. military action against Iran would occur, triggering significant regulatory attention.
- Polymarket facilitated more than $3.6 billion in wagers throughout the 2024 presidential election season and could encounter heightened oversight from federal regulators if legislation advances.
Legislators in Washington are making moves to eliminate prediction market contracts connected to mortality, armed conflicts, and political assassinations. Two distinct legislative proposals submitted this week have the potential to fundamentally alter operations for platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi within American borders.
Democratic representatives in the House brought forward the Banning Games on Deaths and Elections Act. This legislation seeks to eliminate event-based contracts associated with electoral outcomes, military engagements, and human mortality on regulated trading venues. The proposal would modify the Commodity Exchange Act by designating such contracts as “contrary to the public interest.”
This designation represents a criterion the Commodity Futures Trading Commission currently employs to prevent contract approvals. However, no explicit statutory language has previously supported this regulatory stance.
This absence of clear legal authority enabled Kalshi to prevail against the CFTC in judicial proceedings last year, securing permission to offer U.S. election-related markets. The proposed legislation attempts to eliminate this regulatory vulnerability.
In a concurrent initiative, Sen. Adam Schiff alongside Rep. Mike Levin unveiled the DEATH BETS Act — an acronym for Discouraging Exploitative Assassination, Tragedy, and Harm Betting in Event Trading Systems Act. This measure focuses on any CFTC-registered marketplace providing contracts connected to terrorist activities, assassinations, military conflicts, or individual fatalities.
The Catalyst Behind Legislative Action
These legislative efforts emerge following growing unease about insider trading activities across these platforms. Approximately $500 million in wagers were placed regarding the exact timing of American military operations against Iran.
Investigations demonstrated that individuals with privileged information gained financially from these markets. Reports indicate one participant generated $553,000 through a contract speculating on Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei’s possible assassination.
Kalshi and Polymarket addressed the Iran-related contracts through different approaches. Kalshi nullified its Supreme Leader market citing contractual language issues. Polymarket allowed the wager to settle, creating $679 million in contradictory market resolutions and attracting regulatory examination.
Polymarket additionally encountered criticism when it launched a prediction market concerning potential nuclear weapon deployment. The company removed the market from public view after substantial negative feedback.
Potential Outcomes and Next Steps
The DEATH BETS Act has been forwarded to a Senate committee for consideration. No voting schedule exists currently, and whether the legislation will proceed remains uncertain.
The Banning Games on Deaths and Elections Act encounters opposition from cryptocurrency-supportive members of Congress. Bipartisan backing is absent at this juncture.
Should either proposal emerge from committee review, the CFTC could act swiftly to remove war and death contracts from all registered trading platforms.
Bitcoin experienced a 1.8% decline overnight during this timeframe, falling to approximately $69,500, as overall cryptocurrency market confidence weakened.
Polymarket handled in excess of $3.6 billion in wagering volume exclusively during the 2024 U.S. presidential election period. Should these bills move forward, both platforms may encounter elevated examination from the CFTC and SEC.
The CFTC has independently pursued expansion of prediction market applications through a partial-payout structure created in partnership with Cboe. This initiative now coexists with the suggested limitations.
The legislative measures have been sent to committee, without any confirmed schedule for subsequent proceedings.


