Key Points
- Proposed legislation would prohibit Congressional members, presidential administration, and top officials from prediction market participation
- Penalties include 10% financial penalty plus mandatory return of all profits to federal coffers
- Legislation emerges after questionable wagers on Iranian military action generated over $1 million in profits
- Kalshi endorses the proposed legislation; Polymarket remains silent on the matter
- Prior to legislative introduction, both companies revised their terms of service on Monday
A new bipartisan legislative proposal aims to prevent elected officials and high-ranking government employees from participating in prediction market platforms. The proposed PREDICT Act comes from Representative Nikki Budzinski of Illinois, serving the Democratic Party, alongside Representative Adrian Smith, a Nebraska Republican.
The proposed legislation specifically addresses platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi, which allow participants to wager on political developments, governmental choices, and administrative decisions.
The PREDICT Act would impose restrictions on Congressional representatives, presidential and vice-presidential positions, and politically appointed individuals from engaging in market transactions. The prohibition encompasses their married partners and financially dependent offspring as well.
Those found in violation would incur a penalty equivalent to 10% of their transaction’s total worth. Additionally, violators must return their complete earnings to the United States Treasury.
The legislative push follows troubling trading patterns. A limited group of participants earned more than $1 million through Polymarket by wagering on the specific timing of American military action against Iran, demonstrating remarkably accurate predictions.
In a separate incident earlier this year, an unidentified participant secured over $400,000 wagering on Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro’s departure from power, placing the bet mere hours ahead of a US military intervention designed to oust him.
Budzinski expressed that these incidents highlighted concerns regarding whether individuals with privileged access to classified governmental intelligence were exploiting it for financial advantage through prediction platforms.
A Wave of Legislative Action
The PREDICT Act represents just one among multiple legislative proposals addressing prediction markets brought forward in recent months. Senator Chris Murphy, joined by colleagues, presented legislation prohibiting all wagering on terrorist activities, military conflicts, and political assassinations. Senators Jeff Merkley and Amy Klobuchar put forth the End Prediction Market Corruption Act during March.
On Monday, Senators John Curtis and Adam Schiff jointly introduced another bipartisan measure banning sports gambling and casino-type wagering contracts on platforms registered with the CFTC.
At the state government level, eleven states have initiated legal proceedings against prediction market operations, while two additional states have cases currently under consideration.
How the Platforms Are Responding
Kalshi stated it currently prohibits insider trading by governmental personnel and characterized the legislation as a “welcome measure.” The platform expressed support for establishing uniform standards throughout the sector.
Polymarket declined to provide any statement regarding the proposed legislation.
Both platforms modified their internal policies on Monday. Kalshi revealed new verification procedures preventing politicians from wagering on their personal electoral campaigns and prohibiting athletes from betting on competitions in which they participate. Polymarket implemented bans on transactions utilizing misappropriated or confidential intelligence and trades from individuals capable of affecting an event’s result.
Budzinski revealed her office has conducted discussions with the prediction market sector as the legislation advances.
The PREDICT Act would direct suspected infractions to the House Ethics Committee for investigation and enforcement. The bipartisan nature of the proposal, according to Budzinski, enhances its prospects for approval in both the Republican-majority House and Senate.
The legislation doesn’t completely prohibit political staff members from prediction market usage. A senior aide could continue wagering on sporting competitions like March Madness, while being barred from betting on governmental policy matters such as federal agency operational schedules.


