Key Highlights
- Polymarket attracted 45.3 million visitors in March, exceeding its November 2024 peak of 40 million by 13%
- Kalshi drew 13 million visitors in March, roughly doubling its November 2024 figure
- Year-over-year traffic surged nearly 400% for Polymarket and approximately 320% for Kalshi
- The single-day traffic record remains with Election Day 2024 for both platforms
- Conflict-related prediction markets have generated substantial user engagement alongside ethical debates
The prediction market landscape witnessed unprecedented activity in March 2026, with leading platforms Polymarket and Kalshi registering visitor numbers that exceeded their 2024 presidential election benchmarks.
Data from Similarweb indicates Polymarket captured 45.3 million combined desktop and mobile visits throughout March. This marks approximately a 13% climb above the platform’s prior peak of 40 million visits recorded during November 2024.
Meanwhile, Kalshi experienced even more dramatic proportional expansion. The platform welcomed 13 million visitors in March, representing close to a twofold increase from the 7.1 million visits documented in November 2024.
Geopolitical Conflict Markets Fuel Platform Expansion
Much of this explosive growth stems from prediction markets centered on the Iran conflict. These offerings have captured enormous attention from participants eager to place wagers on international developments.
Compared to the previous year, Polymarket’s monthly visitor count has jumped nearly 400%. Kalshi has experienced comparable momentum with approximately 320% growth during the identical timeframe.
While monthly figures reached new heights, the single-day traffic record remains anchored to Election Day 2024. That date brought 8.4 million visitors to Polymarket and 1.9 million to Kalshi.
Following the 2024 electoral cycle, both platforms witnessed dramatic traffic declines. However, visitor numbers rebounded forcefully during early 2026 as tensions involving Iran intensified.
The proliferation of Iran-focused wagering has generated significant debate. The New York Times documented that substantial bets materialized on Polymarket one day prior to U.S. and Israeli military actions against Iran on February 28.
These wagers, frequently exceeding $1,000 individually, forecast American strikes on Iran within 24 hours. The sequence of events prompted speculation regarding whether certain participants possessed insider information about impending military operations.
Polymarket declined to address the Times’ inquiries on this issue. The platform’s website characterizes its Middle East conflict forecasts as “particularly invaluable in gut-wrenching times.”
Platforms Grapple With Morality Questions Surrounding Conflict Betting
Kalshi suspended a prominent betting market labeled “Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader?” after participants staked over $54 million. The platform withheld payouts, citing its prohibition on markets “directly tied to death,” as reported by the Washington Post.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates Kalshi, prohibits trading linked to warfare and mortality. Chief communications officer Elisabeth Diana informed the Times that earning profits from death predictions “is not allowed on Kalshi, and that’s a good thing.”
Despite this stance, Kalshi maintains various Iran-connected markets, including predictions about potential U.S.-Iran nuclear agreements.
Polymarket encountered renewed criticism recently for hosting a market where users predicted the discovery timeline for a missing American pilot whose aircraft was downed over Iran. Representative Seth Moulton condemned the wager as “DISGUSTING” via a social media post on X.
The platform acknowledged removing the market “immediately” while stating it “should not have been posted.” Polymarket maintained the offering “does not meet our integrity standards.”
Operating predominantly internationally, Polymarket avoids the CFTC oversight governing Kalshi. The platform maintains multiple Iran conflict markets, including predictions about potential U.S. ground troop deployment in Iran and conflict resolution timelines. These markets feature disclaimers asserting that the platform’s prediction offerings are “invaluable.”


