TLDR
- Bitcoin and Ethereum use ECDSA encryption that quantum computers could crack by 2030 using Shor’s Algorithm to extract private keys
- Mysten Labs warns major blockchains remain unprepared while networks like Solana using EdDSA are better positioned against quantum threats
- Upgrading requires complex hard forks that face community resistance similar to the 2015 Ethereum Classic split
- Government agencies recommend retiring ECDSA and RSA by 2030-2035 but most crypto networks haven’t started implementing quantum-resistant algorithms
- Up to 25% of Bitcoin in legacy wallets with exposed public keys could be vulnerable to future quantum attacks
Quantum computing poses a serious threat to Bitcoin and Ethereum security within the next five years. Mysten Labs has issued warnings that current encryption methods used by these blockchains could be broken by advancing quantum technology.
The main vulnerability involves ECDSA, the cryptographic system both networks use to secure transactions. Quantum computers using Shor’s Algorithm could solve the mathematical problems protecting ECDSA, allowing hackers to derive private keys from public blockchain data. This would give attackers access to user wallets and funds.
Kostas Chalkias, chief cryptographer at Mysten Labs, emphasizes the need for immediate action. Government cybersecurity agencies like NIST and ENISA recommend replacing ECDSA and RSA encryption by 2030 to 2035. Most major cryptocurrency networks have not begun this transition.
Research indicates up to 25% of all Bitcoin could be at risk. Legacy wallets with exposed public keys face the greatest danger. Even holders who maintain their private keys may struggle to prove ownership after a quantum attack compromises wallet data.
Some Blockchains Are Better Prepared
Not all cryptocurrencies face equal risk. Blockchains like Solana, Sui, and Near use EdDSA signature schemes instead of ECDSA. These systems offer structural advantages that simplify upgrades to quantum-resistant technology.
Only a handful of projects are actively developing solutions. Sui, Ethereum, and Algorand are testing post-quantum algorithms. Sui has made progress on backward compatibility to protect older accounts not designed for quantum threats.
A Cornell University study found additional risks from AI manipulation. Attackers can inject false data into blockchain-connected AI agents, triggering unauthorized transactions or protocol violations. This compounds security concerns as crypto systems integrate more AI technology.
Why Upgrades Face Major Obstacles
Implementing quantum-resistant encryption requires hard forks for Bitcoin and Ethereum. According to San Jose State University professor Ahmed Banafa, this means restructuring networks, creating new wallet addresses, and migrating all funds to quantum-safe systems.
The crypto community historically resists major changes. When Ethereum reversed a 2015 hack through a hard fork, community opposition led to the creation of Ethereum Classic. Similar divisions could emerge if Bitcoin or Ethereum attempt quantum security upgrades.
The scale presents another challenge. Millions of wallets exist across both networks. Users who fail to upgrade become network vulnerabilities. Those losing funds might blame the blockchain infrastructure, damaging industry trust.
When Bitcoin launched in 2009, quantum computing seemed distant. The SHA-256 system appeared secure for decades. Quantum technology has progressed faster than anticipated, forcing a security reassessment.
If Bitcoin had implemented EdDSA originally, even Satoshi Nakamoto’s wallets would have quantum protection today. That remains theoretical since retroactive changes are impossible.
Limited Industry Collaboration
Partnerships between crypto companies and quantum computing experts remain scarce. Few AI firms collaborate with blockchain developers on secure frameworks. Academic cooperation between blockchain and quantum researchers stays limited.
Chalkias warns the industry prioritizes growth over security preparations. Time exists to address these risks, but protocols must assess their cryptographic systems now and plan phased rollouts of post-quantum solutions.
Experts caution that quantum computing breakthroughs could accelerate unexpectedly. AI advances might compress threat timelines by years, making immediate action critical for blockchain security.
Get 3 Free Stock Ebooks
Discover top-performing stocks in AI, Crypto, and Technology with expert analysis.
- Top 10 AI Stocks - Leading AI companies
- Top 10 Crypto Stocks - Blockchain leaders
- Top 10 Tech Stocks - Tech giants
