TLDR
- NHTSA extends Tesla’s deadline as Full Self-Driving complaints continue to grow
- Tesla faces deeper scrutiny as regulators review thousands of FSD safety records
- Expanding probe examines claims of traffic violations linked to Tesla’s FSD system
- Regulatory pressure rises as Tesla balances FSD ambitions with safety oversight
- Extended timeline signals broader U.S. review of automated driving risks
Regulators extended Tesla’s response timeline as they examined claims involving Full Self-Driving behavior on public roads. The decision added new pressure because the company must supply extensive records tied to reported violations. The extension also signaled an expanding inquiry as officials reviewed growing complaint data.
NHTSA Extends Review Timeline
NHTSA granted Tesla additional time after receiving a request for more days to finish its document review. Tesla explained that its team must manually examine thousands of records and therefore needs a longer window. NHTSA accepted the revised schedule and moved the deadline to February 23.
The agency continued tracking cases that may involve traffic violations linked to the company’s Full Self-Driving system. Officials logged 62 complaints and added other reports identified through media and crash data. Therefore, the updated deadline will allow regulators to compare the records more effectively.
Tesla reported that 8,313 remaining documents require review and that its staff can process about 300 each day. The company also cited other ongoing investigations that demand simultaneous attention. Consequently, Tesla warned that overlapping requests could affect its internal review capacity.
Scope of the FSD Investigation Widens
NHTSA opened its evaluation in October because reports suggested that some FSD-enabled vehicles may break traffic rules. The agency requested detailed information in December and asked for data on complaints, lawsuits, and internal assessments. Regulators sought clarity on any confirmed or potential incidents tied to alleged system behavior.
The investigation covers claims that vehicles may run red lights or enter incorrect lanes while the system is active. Officials are reviewing data to determine whether a defect or operational risk exists. In addition, the review includes information from external crash reports that may show similar patterns.
Tesla continued supplying required materials while organizing responses to multiple inquiries. The company noted that holiday schedules and staffing limits slowed its pace. Nevertheless, Tesla said it intends to complete the request within the revised timeline.
Regulatory Pressure Aligns With Long-Term Automation Plans
The investigation remains important because Tesla promotes Full Self-Driving as a core technology for future automated services. Any regulatory conclusions could influence how the company advances its planned robotaxi projects. The review may affect public and policy confidence in the system’s reliability.
NHTSA emphasized the need for precise data as automation systems expand across U.S. roads. The agency signaled that safety oversight will remain strict as companies introduce advanced features. Additionally, the review underscores the importance of transparent reporting from manufacturers.
Tesla continued operating its vehicles under existing rules while responding to all investigative demands. The company expects regulatory engagement to remain active as automation progresses. Therefore, the extended deadline will shape the next phase of the FSD inquiry.
Get 3 Free Stock Ebooks
Discover top-performing stocks in AI, Crypto, and Technology with expert analysis.
- Top 10 AI Stocks - Leading AI companies
- Top 10 Crypto Stocks - Blockchain leaders
- Top 10 Tech Stocks - Tech giants
