Key Takeaways
- Michael Burry has completely divested his GameStop holdings in response to Ryan Cohen’s $56 billion eBay acquisition proposal
- The investor cited significant concerns about debt leverage and equity dilution incompatible with his original value-focused strategy
- GameStop shares declined more than 10% in the aftermath of this development
- Analyst Colin Sebastian from Baird assigns minimal chances of deal completion, pointing to strategic misalignment and structural obstacles
- Industry observers anticipate eBay’s board will turn down the proposal, potentially implementing poison pill protections
The ambitious $56 billion acquisition attempt of eBay by Ryan Cohen has created significant turbulence among GameStop shareholders, triggering a steep 10% decline in GME shares and causing one of the company’s most prominent investors to completely liquidate his holdings.
Michael Burry, the legendary investor whose prescient bets were chronicled in “The Big Short,” announced through his Substack publication that he has completely exited his GME stake. His rationale was unambiguous: the substantial debt financing necessary for the eBay transaction fundamentally contradicts the conservative, Berkshire Hathaway-inspired investment philosophy he initially embraced.
“Wall Street does indeed mistake debt for creativity, and does so constantly,” Burry wrote. “I of all people should have known.”
The transaction proposal calls for GameStop to purchase eBay through an evenly split structure of cash and equity. The underlying rationale suggests that merging these two entities could forge a more comprehensive e-commerce ecosystem focused on collectibles and secondary goods.
Burry didn’t completely dismiss the strategic vision. He recognized that the collectibles and resale market represents a potentially massive opportunity worth hundreds of billions of dollars. He indicated he does “support the effort” ā though he believes the implementation challenges present unacceptable risk levels.
His primary apprehension centers on the financial architecture. He characterized certain leverage possibilities as approaching “on distressed” territory, implying the transaction would require flawless execution to warrant the substantial balance sheet pressure.
Burry also voiced skepticism about the deal’s viability, forecasting that eBay will “reject GameStop’s offer out of hand.” He portrayed the initiative as motivated primarily by financial aspirations rather than authentic operational synergy.
Wall Street Perspective on the Deal
Baird’s Colin Sebastian shares Burry’s doubts about the transaction. He assigns minimal probability to successful completion based on several fundamental concerns.
Sebastian’s primary objection centers on the premise that eBay requires a strategic redirection away from its current technology-focused marketplace approach ā an assumption he finds questionable considering eBay has already achieved renewed growth momentum. Gross merchandise volume and revenue metrics are performing consistently with overall e-commerce sector patterns.
His secondary reservation involves value generation. While the transaction may appear earnings-enhancing on spreadsheets, Sebastian contends this reflects financial manipulation rather than authentic operational benefits. This dynamic creates uncertainty about sustained competitiveness rather than reinforcing it.
He further identifies the approval barrier. Considering the strategic disconnect, Sebastian perceives minimal likelihood that eBay’s directors will embrace the proposal. He explicitly references potential defensive tactics, including poison pill implementations.
Cohen’s Strategic Vision
Cohen’s underlying argument centers on deploying GameStop’s substantial cash reserves to construct an enterprise far exceeding a traditional video game merchant. The eBay proposition aligns with this ambition ā uniting two platforms with demonstrated strength in collectibles and secondary marketplaces.
However, skeptics suggest he may be overreaching. The transaction’s sheer magnitude, valued at $56 billion, creates tremendous pressure on both implementation and capital structure. Even sympathetic observers like Burry believe the viable path forward is extremely constrained.
GameStop has not verified whether any official proposal has been submitted, and eBay has remained publicly silent regarding the reported acquisition approach.


