Key Takeaways
- Sen. Gillibrand insists on ethics provisions barring senior officials from crypto holdings before CLARITY Act advances
- Proposed ethics restrictions would apply to Congress members, administration officials, president, and vice president
- Senate floor vote possible by August 10 if negotiations conclude within the coming week
- Banking Committee markup hearing remains unscheduled after January postponement
- Market odds show 65% probability of legislation passing into law by late 2026
Speaking at Miami’s Consensus conference on Wednesday, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand emphasized that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act will remain stalled unless lawmakers incorporate ethics language prohibiting senior government figures from maintaining personal financial interests in cryptocurrency.
“There will be no one voting for this bill if we don’t have an ethics provision,” Gillibrand said at the event.
The Democratic senator from New York, who has spent years negotiating bipartisan digital asset legislation, explained that the proposed requirement would restrict members of Congress, high-ranking administration personnel, and both the president and vice president from generating profits through crypto connections related to their governmental roles.
“It is the worst form of pay-for-play,” Gillibrand said.
Though Gillibrand avoided directly mentioning President Donald Trump, his cryptocurrency connections have attracted significant attention. His involvement spans launching a memecoin bearing his name, his family’s participation in digital asset company World Liberty Financial, and additional industry relationships.
Administration representatives have rejected claims that Trump’s business activities create conflicts of interest. They’ve additionally stated opposition to any legislation explicitly targeting the president.
Conditions Required for Legislative Progress
Gillibrand indicated that lawmakers continue negotiating terms related to consumer safeguards and illicit finance measures. She stressed that resolving the ethics question within the next seven days is essential for obtaining bipartisan support during a Senate Banking Committee hearing potentially scheduled for next week.
Should these concerns be addressed and the current proposal merged with the version previously approved by the Senate Agriculture Committee, Gillibrand suggested a full Senate vote could occur before lawmakers leave for their August break starting August 10.
She predicted a final vote could come in the first week of August, “if we’re lucky.”
Last week, banking committee senators announced an agreement regarding stablecoin yield provisions. While viewed as progress, that arrangement didn’t tackle the ethics requirements for public servants.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse stated Tuesday that legislators probably have approximately two weeks to take action before midterm election considerations make passage more difficult.
Current Status of the Legislation
The Senate Banking Committee delayed a markup session for the bill in January. By Wednesday, no new date had been announced.
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong declared when the hearing was postponed that his platform couldn’t endorse the legislation in its current form. Additional cryptocurrency firms similarly expressed reservations about language concerning decentralized finance, stablecoins, and tokenized securities.
Summer Mersinger, who leads the Blockchain Association and previously served as a Commodity Futures Trading Commission commissioner, remarked at Consensus that although the present opportunity matters, it likely won’t represent the final possibility for the bill’s passage.
On Polymarket, a prediction markets platform, participants currently estimate a 65% likelihood that the CLARITY Act becomes law by 2026’s conclusion. Kalshi traders place the probability of passage before August at 49%.


