Quick Summary
- Event betting platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket are rapidly scaling operations nationwide, even in jurisdictions that prohibit traditional gambling
- Mental health professionals caution that addiction treatment infrastructure is failing to match the expansion of digital wagering services
- These platforms position themselves as sellers of event contracts regulated by the federal CFTC rather than state-supervised gambling businesses
- California allocates only $9 million annually for problem gambling programs—a fraction of its spending on tobacco and alcohol harm reduction
- Federal legislation called the Points Act, presented to Congress this past March, seeks to establish the nation’s first federal budget for gambling addiction services
Event betting platforms are experiencing explosive expansion throughout America. Services like Kalshi and Polymarket enable participants to wager on diverse outcomes ranging from entertainment awards ceremonies to international soccer match statistics. However, mental health professionals are raising alarms that infrastructure designed to assist individuals struggling with wagering compulsions is woefully inadequate.
Kalshi promoted its services during NBA championship broadcasts. Polymarket secured branding placement on the octagon at a UFC competition hosted at the White House this past Sunday. The sector is aggressively pursuing mainstream cultural penetration.
The accelerated expansion of online wagering platforms stems from 2018, when the nation’s highest court struck down the federal prohibition on sports betting. Following that landmark decision, legal sports wagering has been authorized in 39 states plus the District of Columbia. Event betting markets have traveled a comparable trajectory.
These Companies Navigate State Regulations Through Federal Classification
Kalshi and Polymarket maintain they don’t qualify as gambling enterprises. Their position is that they provide event-based derivative contracts that should be governed by the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission instead of state gambling oversight agencies.
This interpretation has enabled their operations in jurisdictions like Utah and Hawaii, where conventional gambling remains prohibited by law. Legal challenges disputing this classification have emerged in more than a dozen states.
The current administration has aligned itself with platform operators. President Trump stated recently that maintaining CFTC exclusive regulatory authority over prediction markets was of critical importance. A CFTC representative verified the commission’s commitment to protecting that jurisdiction from state-level legal challenges.
Litigation continues even as industry penetration deepens.
Treatment Infrastructure Severely Underfunded
Timothy Fong, an addiction psychiatrist at UCLA, explained that expanded accessibility and social acceptance of wagering-type platforms inevitably produces higher participation rates and greater harm. He emphasized that problem gambling treatment capacity is dramatically lagging behind online betting proliferation.
California dedicates approximately $9 million annually to problem gambling initiatives through its Department of Health. This represents a small fraction of state expenditures addressing tobacco and alcohol-related public health concerns.
Utah presents an even more concerning scenario. Despite stringent anti-gambling statutes and zero federal or state-funded problem gambling programs, the National Council on Problem Gambling’s crisis line has logged nearly 18,000 contacts from Utah residents since 2016.
The helpline operates entirely through charitable contributions. Cole Wogoman from the National Council explained that crisis counselors can only direct callers toward resources available in their specific state. For Utah residents, that translates to extremely limited assistance.
Gamblers Anonymous maintains just a single physical meeting location statewide, situated in St. George. Virtual meeting options have expanded accessibility since the pandemic, yet coverage gaps remain substantial.
One trustee, identified as Michael C., observed that wagering behavior occurs regardless of legal status. He additionally characterized certain day trading and stock market participation as gambling when individuals lack self-control over their financial decisions.
The National Council on Problem Gambling endorses the Points Act, submitted to Congress this March. The legislation would establish the country’s inaugural federal funding mechanism for gambling addiction prevention and treatment programs. Wogoman emphasized that federal intervention is desperately needed and long overdue.


