Key Takeaways
- On July 2, Brazilian Senate committees convened to address escalating betting advertisements tied to 2026 FIFA World Cup coverage.
- Gambling disorder treatment through Brazil’s public healthcare network increased by 140% from 2018 through 2025.
- Approximately 25 million Brazilians participated in gambling activities during 2025, with 4.4% displaying gambling disorder indicators.
- Senator Eduardo Girão advocated for complete repeal of Brazil’s gambling legislation, emphasizing damage to households and community welfare.
- Regulatory authorities proposed enhanced safeguards including expenditure caps and improved platform oversight mechanisms.
On July 2, Brazil’s Senate convened a hearing focused on the expanding presence of gambling advertisements during 2026 FIFA World Cup television broadcasts. The CAS and CDH committees jointly organized this public forum.
Parliamentarians examined the proliferation of betting marketing campaigns following industry legalization. They evaluated gambling’s impact on households, at-risk populations, and consumer protections.
Senator Eduardo Girão presided over the hearing’s opening segment. He characterized the gambling expansion as a crisis of national significance.
Girão emphasized that betting operations now penetrate everyday life through mobile devices, social networks, sporting event coverage, and pervasive promotional campaigns. He reiterated his position calling for complete reversal of Brazil’s gambling legislation.
Senator Damares Alves oversaw the session’s latter portion. She reported that families have increasingly approached legislative offices expressing alarm regarding problem gambling impacts.
Healthcare Authorities Flag Growing Crisis
Roberto Lasserre, representing advocacy organization Movimento Brasil sem Azar, delivered testimony during proceedings. Attorney Juliana Prates Coimbra also addressed the committee, recounting her family’s tragedy following her brother’s death linked to gambling addiction.
Gabriella de Andrade Boska, a mental health policy specialist with Brazil’s Ministry of Health, explained that gambling disorder now receives classification as a public health emergency. She noted that while cases have been documented since 1982, prevalence has escalated dramatically with digital gambling platforms.
Boska reported that Brazil’s Unified Health System recorded a 140% increase in gambling disorder treatment episodes between 2018 and 2025. She indicated that more than 25 million Brazilian citizens engaged in gambling during 2025, with 4.4% exhibiting clinical gambling disorder symptoms.
She further noted that each gambling disorder case typically affects approximately six additional individuals in the person’s social circle. According to her testimony, individuals carrying gambling-related debt face suicide risk fifteen times higher than the general population.
Government Officials Outline Protection Measures
Fabio Macorin, representing Brazil’s Secretariat of Prizes and Betting, explained that authorized operators must implement user behavior monitoring systems. He described interventions that may include alerts, usage restrictions, or mandatory account closures for individuals displaying concerning patterns.
Macorin emphasized that automated technology-based surveillance systems prove more effective than manual oversight approaches. Hermano Tavares, a mental health specialist from the University of São Paulo, highlighted that continuous digital betting access significantly elevates addiction vulnerability.
Tavares recommended implementing Brazil’s CPF taxpayer identification framework for bettor tracking purposes. He additionally proposed mandatory caps on gambling expenditures, suggesting limits of 1% of daily earnings or 4% of monthly income.
Luiz Orsatti Filho, representing consumer protection agency Procon-SP, observed that the betting sector expanded beyond regulatory projections. He referenced persistent consumer complaints involving frozen accounts, payment processing delays, and deceptive advertising practices.
The hearing concluded without producing immediate legislative action. Senate officials indicated that regulatory discussions will continue in subsequent sessions.


