Key Points
- On June 17, 2026, Kalshi prohibited Indian users from accessing its platform after India categorized prediction trading as unlawful online gambling under its 2025 gaming regulations.
- Following official notification from India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Kalshi modified its user agreement to exclude India-based members.
- The Indian market represented significant value for Kalshi — trading activity on a single domestic cricket event exceeded $27 million.
- Kalshi’s exclusion list now encompasses 55 territories, including nations like Brazil, Spain, Indonesia, Argentina, and Portugal.
- The fundamental question centers on whether prediction markets constitute financial trading instruments or gambling services — a distinction most international regulators are ruling against Kalshi.
Kalshi, the prediction market trading platform, has barred access for users in India following enforcement of the nation’s updated online gaming regulations, expanding its catalog of prohibited territories to include another significant market.
New Gaming Regulations Force Platform Exit
The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025 became operational in India on May 1, 2026. This legislation specifically addresses digital services offering monetary-based activities dependent on uncertain results — a classification Indian regulators have applied to event trading services such as Kalshi.
On April 25, 2026, Kalshi received official correspondence from India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. The communication indicated that permitting Indian residents to continue platform access would constitute a breach of the newly implemented regulations.
Kalshi initially delayed implementing access restrictions. Subsequently, Indian regulatory bodies directed telecommunications providers to block Polymarket, Kalshi’s primary rival, while cautioning VPN services against facilitating circumvention of the prohibition.
Confronted with the prospect of nationwide blocking and potential legal exposure for payment processing partners, Kalshi revised its member agreement on June 17. The updated terms specifically prohibit individuals residing in or domiciled within India from participating in event contract trading.
Significant Revenue Stream Eliminated
The Indian market represented substantial business for Kalshi. Trading volume for just one domestic cricket match on the platform surpassed $27 million, demonstrating the depth of participation from Indian traders.
Eliminating this market access delivers a significant blow to Kalshi’s global expansion objectives. The company has been actively pursuing positioning as a legitimate retail financial service across markets outside American borders.
India joins a lengthening list of excluded markets. Brazil prohibited Kalshi in April 2026, designating its political and economic trading contracts as unlicensed wagering activities. Spain initiated regulatory enforcement actions in late May and mandated domestic ISPs to restrict platform access.
Indonesia, Argentina, and Portugal have implemented comparable limitations within the last half-year. Throughout 2026, over ten national governments have enacted prohibitions or substantial constraints on prediction market services.
Kalshi’s restricted territories list now includes 55 jurisdictions.
Regulatory Classification Controversy
The fundamental challenge revolves around the proper categorization of prediction markets. Within the United States, Kalshi maintains legal operation under Commodity Futures Trading Commission supervision as a registered contract market.
Kalshi maintains its contracts — spanning geopolitical developments, economic indicators, and climate-related outcomes — provide legitimate financial hedging capabilities. According to the company, this fundamental purpose distinguishes them from traditional gambling operations.
International regulatory authorities have predominantly dismissed this interpretation. Their stance holds that staking money on future event outcomes constitutes gambling activity, irrespective of the underlying subject matter.
This regulatory disagreement has positioned Kalshi as a global precedent case. With India now inaccessible and the exclusion list reaching 55 territories, the platform’s international growth strategy encounters escalating regulatory headwinds.


