Key Takeaways
- Indonesian authorities have officially blocked access to Polymarket, categorizing the platform as unlawful internet gambling according to domestic regulations.
- Alexander Sabar, Director General overseeing digital supervision, stated that utilizing blockchain technology or cryptocurrency does not alter the fundamental nature of betting on unpredictable events.
- The prohibition emerged following the creation of a Polymarket betting contract speculating on President Prabowo Subianto’s departure from office, appearing shortly after significant policy announcements.
- Indonesia now stands alongside Brazil, Argentina, India, Singapore, and additional nations in implementing restrictions against the platform.
- Recent U.S. court rulings have similarly denied requests from Polymarket and Kalshi to prevent gambling enforcement proceedings in Nevada and Washington state.
Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs has taken decisive action against Polymarket, the blockchain-based prediction marketplace, designating it as unlawful online gambling. This decision represents the latest development in an expanding worldwide regulatory response targeting the platform.
Polymarket operates by allowing participants to purchase and sell contracts connected to real-world developments — spanning political elections, cryptocurrency valuations, sporting competitions, and governmental decisions. However, regulatory bodies across numerous jurisdictions contend this constitutes gambling under different terminology.
Timing and Triggers Behind Indonesia’s Decision
The enforcement action occurred soon after a Polymarket betting contract surfaced that speculated on the timeline for Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s exit from leadership. His presidential mandate extends through 2029. The controversial contract went live on May 21, immediately following Prabowo’s announcement regarding plans to consolidate governmental authority over strategic commodity exports such as coal and palm oil.
Alexander Sabar, who serves as Director General for Digital Space Supervision, characterized the platform’s operations as “betting and speculation on uncertain outcomes,” constituting a clear breach of Indonesian legal frameworks. He emphasized that incorporating blockchain infrastructure or cryptocurrency tokens fails to transform the platform’s essential gambling characteristics.
The ministry confirmed it has terminated access to Polymarket while initiating comprehensive tracking of all associated social media profiles. Officials indicated plans to identify and restrict additional comparable platforms operating in Indonesian digital space.
Government representatives framed the action as protective, particularly targeting younger internet users who face potential financial harm and legal consequences from participation.
Worldwide Regulatory Resistance
Indonesia’s position reflects a broader international trend. Ministry officials noted that Singapore, Brazil, and India have all implemented Polymarket blockages. Taiwan, Thailand, China, and Japan maintain various regulatory limitations under their respective legal systems. Ukraine has enacted a permanent prohibition with no possibility of reinstatement.
Brazil took coordinated action against both Polymarket and competing platform Kalshi during April. Financial regulators determined these platforms failed to comply with domestic derivatives trading requirements. Finance Minister Dario Durigan revealed that approximately 28 betting platforms received bans as part of comprehensive enforcement efforts.
Argentina mandated a country-wide restriction in March. A Buenos Aires judicial ruling compelled internet service providers, Google, and Apple to limit platform accessibility. Authorities characterized the service as an unauthorized gambling operation with insufficient identity verification and age-checking mechanisms.
India restricted Polymarket access after categorizing it as forbidden online money gaming. Kalshi similarly faces regulatory examination in the Indian market.
Within the United States, Polymarket confronts distinct regulatory challenges. On May 22, a Ninth Circuit court dismissed attempts by Kalshi and Polymarket to block gambling enforcement initiatives in Nevada and Washington state. State regulators maintain that contracts based on sporting events constitute unlicensed gambling operations.
Polymarket continues seeking regulatory authorization in Japan targeting 2030, despite stringent gambling legislation that restricts most wagering activities to government-sanctioned operations.
The Indonesian ministry issued warnings to citizens against participation in any form of digital gambling, explicitly including platforms utilizing cryptocurrency assets. Officials pledged ongoing collaboration with law enforcement agencies to surveil similar services operating in the digital sphere.


