Key Takeaways
- Kalshi restricted Indian access following enforcement of India’s 2025 Online Gaming Act on May 1, 2026, which categorizes event-based contract trading as unlawful gambling
- The platform revised its member terms on June 17 to prohibit trading by India-based users
- The Indian market was substantial—a single cricket event saw more than $27 million in platform volume
- The platform’s exclusion list has grown to 55 territories, featuring Brazil, Spain, Indonesia, Argentina, and Portugal
- The central conflict involves whether prediction platforms function as financial instruments or gambling venues
India Restricts Kalshi Access Under New Gaming Legislation
Kalshi has incorporated India into its list of prohibited territories following the implementation of the nation’s latest online gaming legislation and subsequent regulatory classification as an unauthorized gambling operation.
The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025 became operational on May 1, 2026. This legislation bans platforms that facilitate wagering on outcomes determined by chance or uncertainty.
Indian regulatory bodies dismissed Kalshi’s position that it functions as an information marketplace. On April 25, 2026, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology issued Kalshi a formal notice regarding ongoing access by Indian residents.
After platforms failed to voluntarily implement access restrictions, the ministry pursued enforcement measures. Government authorities directed internet service providers to block access to Polymarket, Kalshi’s primary competitor, while cautioning VPN services against facilitating circumvention efforts.
Kalshi modified its member agreement on June 17. The updated contract language now specifically prohibits individuals residing in or based within India from participating in event contract trading.
Significant Market Withdrawal
The Indian market represented considerable value for Kalshi. One recent domestic cricket match alone produced over $27 million in platform trading activity.
Withdrawing from India represents a significant setback to Kalshi’s international expansion strategy. The company has been actively positioning its services as legitimate retail financial products in markets beyond the United States.
This exclusion demonstrates the rapid pace at which prediction trading platforms are encountering regulatory barriers internationally. Throughout 2026, over 10 national governments have enacted prohibitions or substantial limitations on these services.
Expanding Geographic Restrictions
Kalshi’s exclusion roster currently encompasses 55 nations. Brazil implemented platform restrictions in April, determining that its political and economic contracts constituted unauthorized gambling operations.
Spain initiated disciplinary actions in late May and mandated that local internet providers terminate access. Indonesia, Argentina, and Portugal have all enacted comparable restrictions within the last six months.
Each additional prohibition increases compliance obligations and complicates efforts to sustain widespread international availability.
The Regulatory Classification Debate
The fundamental issue centers on competing interpretations of what prediction markets represent. Within the United States, Kalshi maintains authorization from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission operating as a designated contract market.
Kalshi contends that trading contracts based on geopolitical developments, economic indicators, or climate projections provides legitimate financial hedging capabilities. The company maintains this differs fundamentally from traditional casino wagering.
International regulators have predominantly rejected this interpretation. Most authorities conclude that risking money on uncertain future outcomes constitutes gambling regardless of the underlying subject.
This fundamental disagreement has positioned Kalshi as a benchmark case for governmental approaches to event-based contract trading.
With India now inaccessible and the restricted territory count reaching 55 jurisdictions, Kalshi’s international growth ambitions confront substantial obstacles. While sector-wide trading volumes remain elevated, the regulatory landscape beyond US borders continues growing more restrictive.


