Key Takeaways
- Jordan Maynard, chair of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, expressed concern that prediction platforms and unlicensed operators are reaching individuals younger than 21
- A new collaboration with BetBlocker will enable families to restrict access to wagering websites, including prediction platforms, on minors’ devices
- The Bay State achieved a legal milestone by obtaining a court decision preventing Kalshi from providing sports-based prediction contracts
- The gaming chief advocated for nationwide advertising standards for wagering, noting current ad saturation exceeds reasonable levels while remaining constitutionally protected
- Recent regulations mandate that platforms inform users about betting restrictions within two days and provide clear explanations for such actions
The head of Massachusetts’ gaming oversight body is sounding warnings about emerging threats from prediction platforms and unlicensed wagering operations. During an appearance on WCVB’s “On the Record,” Jordan Maynard discussed how the nation’s expanding wagering industry creates heightened risks, particularly for younger demographics.
Maynard identified prediction platforms as especially problematic. While licensed sports wagering operations and gaming establishments enforce a minimum age requirement of 21, prediction platforms function under federal commodities regulations and permit participation from 18-year-olds.
“Licensed operators employ sophisticated verification systems,” Maynard explained. “Meanwhile, unlicensed operations and these prediction platforms actively pursue individuals below the age of 21.”
Numerous investigations have confirmed these assertions. An investigation by The Wall Street Journal revealed that services including Kalshi and Polymarket have marketed their offerings through TikTok and Instagram. This marketing strategy included compensated influencer posts that frequently lacked proper advertising disclosures.
College campus outreach has emerged as another concern. Earlier in the year, controversy arose regarding possible insider information usage on prediction platforms related to Super Bowl halftime show celebrity guest appearances on university grounds.
Bay State Pursues Legal Challenge Against Prediction Platforms
Massachusetts has taken proactive steps to restrict prediction platform operations within state lines. The commonwealth became the first jurisdiction to obtain judicial approval blocking Kalshi from offering wagering contracts connected to athletic competitions.
Nevertheless, Kalshi subsequently secured a temporary halt that permits continued operations during the ongoing legal proceedings. Maynard has voiced support for the litigation and maintains that prediction platforms constitute unauthorized sports wagering.
The MGC has also unveiled a collaboration with BetBlocker, a technology solution designed to prevent gambling access. According to Maynard, families can implement BetBlocker on young people’s mobile devices to restrict access not only to authorized wagering platforms but also to unlicensed international operations and prediction services.
From a regulatory perspective, Maynard emphasized numerous protective measures Massachusetts has established. The commonwealth employs dedicated full-time personnel concentrating exclusively on responsible gaming initiatives, which he characterized as unique among state regulators nationwide.
Protective features available to users include deposit caps, time restrictions, and budget management tools. Additionally, a comprehensive statewide voluntary exclusion program encompasses gaming establishments, sports wagering platforms, and horse racing venues.
Push for Nationwide Gambling Advertisement Regulations
Recently, Massachusetts established a first-in-the-nation requirement compelling operators to notify users about any imposed wagering restrictions within 48 hours. Platforms must additionally provide justification for the limitation and identify which betting categories are affected.
Last year, the MGC levied a state-record $450,000 penalty against DraftKings for permitting credit card deposits in violation of regulations. This enforcement action came before DraftKings’ announcement to discontinue credit card deposits across all markets.
Maynard also voiced frustration regarding gambling promotions. “Advertising volume has become excessive… it’s personally irritating,” he stated, while recognizing that regulators face constitutional constraints preventing absolute prohibitions due to First Amendment protections.
As an alternative, he proposed that gambling promotional standards could be established through federal-level guidelines. He has previously cautioned that the national wagering marketplace threatens to become a “highway without speed limits” unless consumer safeguards advance alongside industry expansion.
Promotional regulations currently differ substantially between jurisdictions. New York maintains stringent requirements governing message content and minor-focused targeting. Tennessee mandates prior regulatory review of all marketing materials and prohibits celebrity spokespersons. Jurisdictions including Florida, Indiana, and Pennsylvania lack comparable restrictions.
New York Congressman Paul Tonko has introduced legislation establishing national advertising standards in three successive congressional sessions. His proposals have received minimal support from fellow legislators.


