Key Points
- The Michigan Gaming Control Board has terminated its membership with the National Council on Problem Gambling.
- The withdrawal represents a direct challenge to Kalshi’s platinum-tier partnership with NCPG.
- Kalshi committed $2 million to NCPG spanning a two-year period starting in May.
- A temporary restraining order was issued by Michigan against Kalshi on June 29 regarding sports event contracts.
- The National Council on Problem Gambling maintains neutrality regarding the legality of individual gambling offerings.
The Michigan Gaming Control Board has severed its affiliation with the National Council on Problem Gambling. This departure signals a strong objection to NCPG’s decision to welcome Kalshi as a platinum-tier partner.
Executive director Henry Williams communicated the board’s position through a formal letter issued on July 1. The correspondence outlined the rationale behind this significant break.
Kalshi operates as a prediction markets platform. The company became an NCPG member last May, committing a substantial $2 million contribution spread across two years.
According to Williams, this alliance contradicts enforcement measures that various states have already implemented against prediction markets. He expressed concern that it might diminish regulatory authority nationwide.
Michigan’s Concerns About the NCPG-Kalshi Alliance
Williams specifically criticized Kalshi’s marketing strategy for its sports-related contract offerings. He noted the company presents these sporting event contracts as comparable to traditional investment vehicles or insurance instruments.
He contended that this positioning contradicts a fundamental principle of responsible gaming advocacy. The essential principle states that gambling activities should serve entertainment purposes rather than function as wealth-building strategies.
Williams characterized this messaging strategy as damaging to consumer safeguards. He argued that endorsing Kalshi’s narrative communicates problematic messages to consumers.
The communication from Williams conveyed substantial disapproval of NCPG’s decision. His language reflected unambiguous and forceful opposition.
The Council’s Position and Michigan’s Legal Action
The National Council on Problem Gambling issued a statement on the matter prior to Michigan’s public withdrawal. Last month, the organization clarified that it refrains from making determinations about the legality of particular gambling products or services.
NCPG emphasized that its organizational focus encompasses prevention initiatives, educational programs, and treatment accessibility. The council has remained silent since Michigan formally announced its departure.
This membership termination unfolds amid ongoing litigation between Michigan authorities and Kalshi. Michigan obtained a temporary restraining order against the platform on June 29.
The court order prohibits Kalshi from providing sports event contracts to Michigan residents. State regulators contend the company has operated sports gambling operations without proper licensing.
Michigan isn’t the only jurisdiction raising these objections. Additional states have similarly maintained that Kalshi’s contract offerings constitute unauthorized sports betting operations.
Michigan’s withdrawal carries implications beyond simple membership cancellation. State personnel will resign immediately from all NCPG committees and advisory boards where they currently serve.
The state has additionally withdrawn its financial sponsorship of NCPG’s forthcoming annual conference. Michigan officials provided no indication of when they might reconsider this stance.
This controversy underscores widening tensions between traditional gambling oversight bodies and emerging prediction markets companies. Kalshi has encountered comparable legal obstacles across multiple jurisdictions throughout the current year.
Currently, Michigan’s departure represents perhaps the most forceful action taken by any state gaming authority. The legal proceedings against Kalshi in Michigan continue following the restraining order issued in late June.


