Key Points
- Treatment for gambling addiction reached 3,108 cases in the Netherlands during 2025, representing a 13% increase from the previous year’s 2,750 cases
- The surge coincides with the October 2021 legalization of remote gambling through the Remote Gambling Act
- Approximately 50% of individuals seeking treatment had no previous history with specialized addiction services
- Regulatory measures now include advertising restrictions, deposit caps, and gradual elimination of sports sponsorships
- More than 100,000 Dutch residents have enrolled in Cruks, the nationwide gambling exclusion program
Gambling Addiction Treatment Rises Sharply After Dutch Market Opens
The Netherlands experienced a significant jump in individuals seeking professional help for gambling problems during 2025, with evidence suggesting digital betting platforms play a central role.
Data compiled by LADIS, the Dutch addiction monitoring organization, reveals that 3,108 individuals accessed specialized treatment programs for gambling issues throughout the year. This marks a substantial 13% climb from 2,750 cases recorded in 2024.
The upward trajectory represents a reversal of previous trends that had shown declining treatment numbers. This shift emerged approximately four years following the Dutch decision to permit licensed private operators into the online gambling sector.
Remote wagering became legal in October 2021 when the Remote Gambling Act took effect. Authorities designed the legislation to transition unregulated gambling activity into a controlled framework. Mental health professionals cautioned that simplified access combined with aggressive marketing would inevitably trigger increased problem gambling behaviors.
Current treatment statistics appear to validate these initial warnings.
Experts have verified the growth is genuine and not merely a consequence of expanded monitoring coverage. The upward pattern remained consistent even when examining only facilities that have continuously reported data for approximately ten years.
First-Time Treatment Seekers Represent Half of Cases
A particularly noteworthy finding from the LADIS analysis involves patient backgrounds. Roughly half of individuals entering treatment programs in 2025 had never previously engaged with specialized addiction care services. This indicates an influx of new cases rather than recurring issues among already-identified problem gamblers.
Clinics and counseling centers report that smartphone applications have transformed gambling into a round-the-clock activity, embedding it more deeply into everyday routines.
Following market liberalization, gambling companies launched extensive promotional campaigns spanning television broadcasts, radio spots, sporting events, and digital platforms. Within the first several months, hundreds of thousands of new betting accounts were established.
Regulatory Response Strengthens Over Time
Public and political concern escalated rapidly following legalization, prompting Dutch authorities to implement multiple restrictive measures.
Broad-based gambling advertising has been prohibited. Sponsorship arrangements with sports organizations face scheduled elimination. Mandatory daily deposit ceilings now apply to all remote betting accounts.
The Cruks national exclusion registry has expanded beyond 100,000 enrolled participants. Individuals registered in the system cannot access licensed gambling establishments, gaming machine venues, or digital gambling platforms.
While gambling treatment cases have increased, alcohol dependency continues to represent the predominant addiction category within Dutch specialized care systems. Among nearly 68,000 individuals treated for various addictions in 2025, 43% primarily struggled with alcohol-related issues. For patients aged 55 and older, this proportion climbed to 60%.
Cannabis addiction remained the most common concern among individuals under 25 years old.
The LADIS monitoring system provides an incomplete view of the situation. The database captures only specialized treatment providers, and not all facilities participate in reporting. Actual numbers of people receiving gambling-related assistance likely exceed published figures.


