Key Takeaways
- Progress Party’s Himanshu Gulati criticized Norway’s gambling monopoly as outdated at a June 2026 industry conference
- Growing offshore gambling activity undermines the monopoly’s stated purpose of funding public initiatives
- International operators offer advanced responsible gaming features absent from Norway’s current framework
- Improved polling for the Progress Party increases likelihood of gambling reform entering political mainstream
- Norway risks becoming Europe’s sole remaining comprehensive gambling monopoly when Finland transitions in 2027
Political Opposition Intensifies Against State Gambling Control
Norway’s state-controlled gambling framework is encountering unprecedented political resistance, with prominent opposition voices demanding comprehensive regulatory reform.
At the Norwegian Trade Association of Online Gambling’s annual conference on June 16, 2026, Himanshu Gulati from the Progress Party delivered a pointed critique of the existing monopoly structure. He contended that Norway’s approach no longer aligns with contemporary gambling behavior among citizens.
Gulati advocated for implementing a licensing framework, asserting that ideological considerations have overshadowed empirical analysis in policy discussions. He emphasized the importance of establishing a shared factual foundation before determining whether maintaining the monopoly serves the public interest.
The Norwegian monopoly system has traditionally been justified through its revenue contribution to athletics, community organizations, and civic programs. Gulati questioned this rationale directly.
He highlighted that significant numbers of Norwegian gamblers already access international betting platforms operating beyond state oversight. With substantial revenue flowing outside regulated channels, he suggested, authorities must reconsider whether the monopoly remains the most effective funding mechanism for these community benefits.
Player Protection and Sports Integrity Concerns Highlighted
Gulati further contended that Norway forfeits valuable harm minimization capabilities by excluding international gambling operators.
He observed that multinational companies operating across jurisdictions have developed sophisticated responsible gambling frameworks through years of experience. Integrating these operators into a regulated Norwegian market framework could enhance consumer safeguards, according to his assessment.
Similar reasoning applied to combating match manipulation, he noted. Throughout European markets, licensed operators routinely contribute information to sports integrity surveillance platforms. Norway’s restrictive approach limits participation in these collaborative protection systems.
Gulati characterized certain existing Norwegian restrictions as impractical and deserving of reassessment. Gaming sector reform represents a core Progress Party objective, and he identified establishing a licensing system among the party’s foremost cultural policy ambitions should it enter government.
European Context Amplifies Pressure for Change
Strong polling performance by the Progress Party has elevated these reform proposals within public discourse.
The overwhelming majority of European nations operate licensing-based gambling systems where commercial operators compete under regulatory frameworks. Complete state monopolies are exceptional and typically limited to specific market segments.
Finland, which maintained a structure comparable to Norway’s, has enacted legislation transitioning to licensed competition beginning in 2027.
Following Finland’s transformation, Norway appears positioned to become Europe’s singular nation maintaining comprehensive gambling monopoly control across all categories.
This emerging isolation is transforming what previously constituted a specialized policy conversation into a broader political issue.


