Key Takeaways
- Unlicensed offshore gambling platforms undermine Peru’s legal betting sector by circumventing tax obligations and regulatory requirements
- Authorized operators face a 12% levy on gross gaming revenue combined with a 1% charge on each wager placed
- Sports integrity legislation approved by lawmakers faced executive veto and remains in limbo
- Authorities encouraged to prioritize making legal options appealing rather than solely pursuing enforcement measures
- Proposed tourism law amendments could officially incorporate casino and gaming machine businesses into national registry
The authorized gambling sector in Peru continues expanding, yet faces significant obstacles from two primary sources: unauthorized gaming platforms and vulnerabilities related to sporting event integrity.
Carlos Fonseca, a legal expert specializing in gaming regulations and chief executive of Gaming Law SAC, published analysis in El Peruano emphasizing that striking the proper equilibrium among player safeguards, marketplace fairness, and regulatory supervision will determine the industry’s trajectory.
His assessment highlighted that wagering on sporting events demonstrates “persistent and relatively inelastic” consumer demand, indicating that betting activity continues regardless of prevailing economic circumstances, particularly when major global sporting competitions take place.
Unauthorized Platforms Create Market Distortion
The most pressing obstacle confronting Peru’s betting market involves unlicensed international operators functioning without government authorization.
These entities sidestep the taxation requirements and compliance expenses that authorized platforms must shoulder. This creates an unfair advantage that diverts commercial activity and customers away from legitimate channels.
Authorized betting companies in Peru must remit standard corporate taxes alongside an industry-targeted levy equivalent to 12% of gross gaming income. Additionally, authorities implemented a Selective Consumption Tax amounting to 1% assessed on each individual wager.
Fonseca acknowledged that while the aggregate fiscal obligations remain substantial, they fall within parameters observed across international jurisdictions. However, he cautioned that excessive regulatory burdens risk eliminating competitive advantages that legal operators hold against illicit alternatives.
His recommendation emphasized that regulatory bodies should decrease reliance on punitive measures alone and instead concentrate on enhancing the appeal of authorized marketplaces to naturally draw consumers away from unauthorized offshore options.
Match-Fixing Legislation Remains Stalled
Competition manipulation and fraudulent activity within sporting events represent another significant concern for Peru’s wagering industry.
Proposed legislation designed to bolster anti-corruption safeguards successfully navigated Congressional approval. Nevertheless, executive officials rejected the measure, leaving the proposal in bureaucratic suspension pending additional deliberation.
Fonseca emphasized that addressing sporting event integrity demands collaborative efforts spanning regulatory agencies, wagering companies, athletic organizations, and global governance bodies.
He also commended Law No. 31557 along with subsequent modifications, characterizing them as transformative for the nation. That legislative framework established Peru’s inaugural regulations governing digital gambling and wagering activities.
Tourism Legislation May Expand Regulatory Coverage
In parallel developments, Peruvian authorities are considering revisions to tourism statutes that would officially recognize casino establishments and electronic gaming machine operations.
A draft Supreme Decree would modify the General Tourism Law to position casino and slot businesses under the administrative jurisdiction of the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Tourism.
These modifications would not authorize additional gambling establishments. Instead, the measure would register currently operating businesses within the national tourism services database.
The proposal notes that casino and slot operations already function under complete legalization and monitoring through real-time oversight systems that digitally track financial and tax-related activities.
Should authorities approve the amendment, it would modernize tourism legislation to accurately reflect current regulatory frameworks.


