Key Takeaways
- Public opinion tilts against election betting: 44% want it banned versus only 30% supporting legalization
- Sports betting markets enjoy broader acceptance with 53% approval, contrasting sharply with political markets
- Contracts on warfare and terrorism draw the strongest opposition, with 57–64% calling for prohibition
- Trading volume for the 2028 presidential race has already exceeded $700 million on major platforms
- More than 25 legislative proposals targeting prediction markets have emerged this year, including Minnesota’s comprehensive ban
Public Sentiment Clashes With Industry’s Political Market Ambitions
While prediction market platforms aggressively expand their political offerings, recent polling data reveals substantial public resistance to election-based wagering.
According to a POLITICO/Public First poll, nearly half of Americans—44%—believe betting on electoral outcomes should be outlawed. In comparison, just 30% support making such markets legal.
The opposition intensifies for other politically sensitive categories. When asked about warfare-related contracts, 57% of respondents favored prohibition. Markets centered on terrorist activities faced even stronger rejection, with 64% advocating for illegality.
Sports wagering presents a contrasting picture. A majority—53%—endorsed legal sports prediction contracts, while only 23% objected.
Markets focused on weather patterns and entertainment awards similarly received more favorable reception than rejection, with approximately 46% supporting their legality.
Industry Sees Political Contracts as Primary Revenue Engine
Public reservations haven’t deterred prediction market operators from prioritizing political contracts as a cornerstone of future expansion.
Analysts at Bloomberg Intelligence have identified political, electoral, and public policy markets as representing the sector’s “greatest opportunity.” Their projections suggest these categories could account for 27% of total platform activity by 2030, a significant jump from the approximately 10% share recorded in early 2025.
If realized, this shift would generate roughly $266 billion in yearly transaction volume.
Current trading patterns demonstrate robust interest. Markets for the 2028 presidential contest have already processed nearly $700 million in wagers across Kalshi’s domestic platform and Polymarket’s international operations.
The 2024 presidential election shattered previous records, driving more than $3.6 billion in activity on Polymarket alone—the highest volume ever recorded for a single prediction market event.
Regulatory Crackdown Gains Momentum Across Multiple Jurisdictions
Public attitudes appear increasingly aligned with legislative action at state and federal levels.
Congressional lawmakers have introduced over 25 bills addressing prediction markets this year. Proposals range from complete prohibitions on election and sports contracts to targeted restrictions on insider trading and official participation.
The Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act seeks to ban sports and election-based contracts outright. Meanwhile, the Stop Trading on Predictions and Corrupt Bets Act proposes more sweeping restrictions, prohibiting markets linked to elections, governmental decisions, and armed conflicts.
Minnesota made history as the first state to enact comprehensive prediction market restrictions. The legislation prohibits contracts involving sports, elections, meteorological events, and awards ceremonies. Legal challenges from Kalshi, Polymarket, and the CFTC have since been filed against the statute.
Tennessee adopted a more focused strategy, establishing criminal liability for insider trading and price manipulation within prediction markets.
The polling data reveals divided public sentiment overall. Approximately 29% of Americans view the expanding prediction market sector negatively, while just 19% see it as a positive development.
More than half of those surveyed indicated they have no interest in participating in prediction markets whatsoever.


