TLDR
- The Federation Council has greenlit legislation reducing the timeframe for blocking unauthorized gambling sites to two days
- The existing system requires Federal Tax Service involvement before Roskomnadzor can execute blocks, creating significant delays
- Gambling operators frequently exploit these delays by shifting operations to duplicate domains before enforcement occurs
- Separately, the Finance Ministry has floated plans to permit regulated online casino operations subject to 30% taxation on profits
- Religious authorities have voiced strong opposition to any legalization efforts, pointing to potential social harm
Russian authorities are on the verge of obtaining significantly enhanced powers to eliminate illegal gambling websites from the internet. Legislation that has cleared both chambers of parliament would compress the blocking timeline from multiple days to a mere 48-hour window. The measure now sits on President Vladimir Putin’s desk awaiting final approval.
Under current regulations, shutting down an unlicensed gambling platform involves a cumbersome bureaucratic journey. Officials must initially notify the Federal Tax Service about the offending website. Subsequently, that department submits a formal request to add the site to Russia’s official registry of banned online destinations. Only after completing those steps can Roskomnadzor, which oversees telecommunications, distribute the updated blocklist to internet service providers throughout the country.
Legislators argue this bureaucratic pathway provides ample opportunity for exploitation. Gambling operators typically migrate their user traffic to alternative mirror sites long before official blocking procedures conclude.
Nearly Two Decades of Enforcement Challenges
Russia’s battle against online gambling stretches back to 2006, when lawmakers passed legislation essentially prohibiting internet-based casino activities. Following that, a Supreme Court decision mandated that internet service providers block access to international and unlicensed gambling platforms.
Yet those enforcement mechanisms have proven inadequate, as regulators have publicly acknowledged on multiple occasions. Gambling operators deploy mirror websites and various technical strategies to resume operations shortly after being shut down. The pending legislation represents a direct attempt to counter these evasion tactics.
The underlying logic is straightforward: when illegal platforms can rapidly reestablish themselves, enforcement agencies need comparable speed in their response capabilities.
Conflicting Visions for Gambling’s Legal Status
Even as enforcement mechanisms grow more aggressive, an entirely different conversation is unfolding within government circles. According to reports, the Finance Ministry has drafted a proposal that would authorize a limited number of online casinos to operate legally within a controlled regulatory environment. Such licensed operators would face a 30% levy on their yearly profits.
This suggestion has created divisions among government officials and industry stakeholders. Advocates with ties to Russia’s gambling industry contend that establishing a legal framework would generate substantial tax income while diminishing illegal market activity. At least one former gambling regulator has gone further, advocating for expanding licensed brick-and-mortar casinos beyond Russia’s specially designated gambling territories into metropolitan areas.
The Russian Orthodox Church has mounted vigorous opposition to any legalization proposals. Religious leaders have appealed to government officials to reject such measures, cautioning that legalization would amplify current social challenges.
For the immediate future, government policy appears unified around a single objective: making it substantially more difficult for unlicensed operators to maintain an online presence.
Should Putin add his signature to the legislation, Roskomnadzor will gain a dramatically streamlined process—from detecting an illegal casino to directing ISPs to block access. Whether this accelerated approach can finally resolve an enforcement challenge that has persisted for two decades remains an open question.


