Key Takeaways
- A new executive order from President Trump instructs the Federal Reserve to assess whether crypto and fintech companies should receive direct payment account access.
- Federal agencies including the SEC, CFTC, OCC, and FDIC have 90 days to identify and review regulations potentially preventing fintech partnerships with federally regulated banks.
- Digital asset companies may secure “master accounts,” enabling direct connection to U.S. payment infrastructure without requiring traditional bank intermediaries.
- In March 2026, Kraken secured the crypto industry’s first limited-purpose master account from the Kansas City Federal Reserve, triggering controversy among traditional banking institutions.
- Coinciding with this order, Trump’s Truth Social retracted SEC registration documents for multiple cryptocurrency ETFs including Bitcoin and Bitcoin-Ethereum products.
On Tuesday, President Trump issued an executive directive commanding federal financial regulators to assess whether cryptocurrency and financial technology companies deserve direct entry to the Federal Reserve’s payment infrastructure. The directive, formally named “Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks,” instructs several government agencies to scrutinize existing regulations that might be preventing these enterprises from accessing mainstream financial channels.
Trump signed an executive order directing the Fed to review giving crypto firms direct access to US payment rails.
The Fed has 120 days to report back. pic.twitter.com/65iTAaYWx6
— Token Metrics (@tokenmetricsinc) May 20, 2026
The directive provides an expansive definition of fintech enterprises. It encompasses organizations providing digital asset solutions, distributed ledger technology infrastructure, transaction processing services, asset custody, credit facilities, investment services, and securities marketplace functions.
Federal Reserve Responsibilities Under the Directive
The directive’s central component targets the Federal Reserve specifically. Trump instructed the Fed’s Board of Governors to assess whether non-banking entities and uninsured depository organizations handling digital currencies should receive authorization to access Reserve Bank transaction accounts and associated services.
These specialized accounts are referred to as “master accounts.” Obtaining such an account would enable a cryptocurrency company to interface directly with fundamental U.S. payment infrastructure—the essential framework for dollar transactions throughout the nation—eliminating the necessity for conventional banking intermediaries.
Additionally, the directive requires the Fed to determine whether the dozen regional Federal Reserve branches possess autonomous legal jurisdiction to grant or refuse such access. The Federal Reserve must deliver a comprehensive report to the president within a 120-day window.
The directive further instructs the SEC, CFTC, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and FDIC to conduct thorough reviews of existing procedures within 90 days. These regulators must pinpoint regulations that could be obstructing fintech enterprises from establishing relationships with federally supervised financial entities. The administration additionally seeks to simplify application procedures for banking licenses and deposit protection programs.
Kraken’s Account Approval Ignited Controversy
The discussion surrounding cryptocurrency firms receiving Fed master accounts became a significant flashpoint in March 2026. The Kansas City Federal Reserve authorized a limited-scope account for Payward, the corporate entity behind cryptocurrency platform [[LINK_START_3]]Kraken[[LINK_END_3]]. This arrangement provided Kraken with entry to high-value dollar transaction systems, potentially accelerating deposit and withdrawal processes for corporate clientele.
Kraken Co-CEO Arjun Sethi characterized it as the “convergence of crypto infrastructure and sovereign financial rails.” However, the authorization prompted objections from conventional banking organizations.
The Bank Policy Institute, representing prominent U.S. financial institutions, expressed being “deeply concerned” that the authorization occurred before the Fed had established a complete regulatory framework for these accounts.
In December 2025, the Fed released a proposal addressing so-called “skinny” master accounts—a limited variant of central bank accounts offering payment system access while prohibiting interest accumulation on reserves or discount window borrowing privileges.
Legislative Activity on Capitol Hill
During April 2026, California Congressional Representatives Sam Liccardo and Young Kim presented the Payments Access and Consumer Efficiency Act, abbreviated as PACE. This legislation seeks to grant qualified providers entry to Federal Reserve transaction services and has garnered endorsement from cryptocurrency sector organizations, although it remains in preliminary legislative phases.
The executive directive also carries implications for Wyoming special purpose depository institutions—entities specializing in digital currency operations that have pursued Fed master account authorization.
A curious development: approximately concurrent with the executive order’s signing, Trump’s Truth Social retracted SEC registration documents for a Bitcoin ETF, a combined Bitcoin-Ethereum ETF, and a cryptocurrency blue chip ETF—an action seemingly inconsistent with the administration’s generally favorable cryptocurrency position.


