Key Takeaways
- The crypto-backed political action committee Fairshake invested more than $2 million in an unsuccessful attempt to block Democrat Oliver Gilbert from winning Florida’s 24th district primary
- Despite aggressive attack advertising that featured fabricated Miami Herald headlines, Gilbert secured victory with 34.4% of the vote
- In a positive showing elsewhere, Fairshake-supported candidates triumphed in four races spanning Florida, Alaska, and Wyoming during Tuesday’s primaries
- The committee’s cumulative success rate in congressional primaries has reached 49 victories from 53 contested elections
- The composition of Congress following these elections may influence the fate of pending cryptocurrency legislation, including the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act
Fairshake, the cryptocurrency sector’s most influential political action committee, experienced a bittersweet evening during Tuesday’s primary contests, securing victories in four races while suffering a significant defeat despite pouring substantial resources into defeating a single opponent.
Major Setback in Florida’s 24th District
Through its affiliated organization Protect Progress, Fairshake allocated over $2 million toward an aggressive advertising campaign targeting Oliver Gilbert, a Democratic contender vying for Florida’s 24th congressional seat. The investment proved unsuccessful as Gilbert emerged victorious, capturing 34.4% of votes in a competitive multi-candidate race that featured Shevrin Jones and Kendrick Meek among the challengers.
Throughout his candidacy, Gilbert maintained a vocal stance against the cryptocurrency sector. He publicly condemned the organizations financing the attack advertisements as “crypto con artists trying to buy a Democratic primary.”
The advertising campaign generated significant backlash after incorporating fabricated Miami Herald headlines that mischaracterized Gilbert’s policy stances. The newspaper publicly stated that the counterfeit headlines presented a distorted version of its journalism.
Protect Progress stood by its advertising strategy. A representative for the organization stated that “the underlying facts in our ad are true,” notwithstanding the Herald’s formal complaint.
Given that the 24th district leans overwhelmingly Democratic, political analysts anticipate Gilbert will secure the November general election. His victory would place a cryptocurrency skeptic in the halls of Congress.
Successful Campaigns Across Multiple States
Beyond the setback in the Gilbert contest, Fairshake achieved favorable outcomes. The PAC and its partner organizations deployed approximately $3.6 million throughout Florida, Alaska, and Wyoming races.
In Florida, Democrat Lois Frankel emerged victorious in her primary election following more than $150,000 in expenditures from Protect Progress backing her bid.
Republican Sydney Gruters claimed victory in Florida’s 16th district primary race with assistance from PAC funding. Meanwhile in Wyoming, Republican Harriet Hageman secured a decisive win in her Senate primary contest. Hageman is competing for the position currently held by cryptocurrency supporter Senator Cynthia Lummis.
In Alaska’s at-large congressional district, Republican Nick Begich appears poised to move forward in his race.
These four successful campaigns elevate Fairshake’s comprehensive primary election performance to 49 victories from 53 total competitions.
Looking Ahead to General Elections
Fairshake commenced the 2026 election cycle with an impressive $193 million financial reserve. By June, expenditures had exceeded $82 million across various races. During the 2024 election cycle, the PAC deployed more than $130 million backing cryptocurrency-friendly candidates.
The electoral outcomes carry implications extending beyond individual congressional seats. The US Senate is scheduled to consider the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act upon reconvening after its September recess. The legislation successfully passed through the House with cross-party backing in July 2025, receiving 294-134 approval, though Senate Democrats have advocated for enhanced ethics requirements connected to cryptocurrency activities involving the Trump family.
Changes in congressional power dynamics resulting from the November midterm elections could prove decisive in determining whether this regulatory framework advances through the legislative process or encounters delays extending into 2027.


