TLDR
- Tehran is developing an official system to regulate and monetize shipping activity passing through the Strait of Hormuz
- Access will be restricted to cooperative vessels; ships associated with U.S. “Project Freedom” will be barred from the route
- Major technology corporations including Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon face proposed charges for subsea internet infrastructure beneath the strait
- Iranian government-affiliated media has suggested potential disruption to cables if payment demands aren’t met
- Earlier reporting indicated Tehran might accept Bitcoin as payment for passage fees
Tehran is positioning itself to monetize its strategic position over the Strait of Hormuz, developing plans to impose fees on both maritime traffic and international technology corporations utilizing one of the planet’s most vital transit corridors.
Ebrahim Azizi, who leads Iran’s parliamentary national security committee, announced Saturday that Iranian officials have developed a “professional mechanism” to oversee traffic flowing through the strategic channel. According to Azizi, the framework will be revealed shortly, with charges assessed against vessels utilizing a specified shipping corridor.
The designated passage will accommodate only commercial traffic and ships coordinating with Iranian authorities. Azizi indicated the waterway would stay inaccessible to operators connected to what he termed the “freedom project”—referencing U.S. President Donald Trump’s “Project Freedom” initiative designed to maintain commercial navigation through the strait. Trump halted that operation in May.
Maritime Fees and Cryptocurrency Speculation
Tehran has maintained an effective blockade of the Strait of Hormuz following the escalation of U.S.-Israeli military tensions in late February. This closure has triggered significant increases in worldwide oil and natural gas pricing, given that approximately 20% of global petroleum supplies transit through this narrow passage.
Earlier reporting this year indicated Iran might collect passage fees using digital currency, particularly Bitcoin. Iranian state television also broadcast that European nations had initiated discussions with the Revolutionary Guards naval forces regarding vessel transit arrangements, though specific countries were not identified.
Trump has opposed any Iranian authority over the strait and has demanded the waterway’s reopening. Friday reports suggested Trump was evaluating further military options against Iran, having stated earlier in the week that the ceasefire situation was barely surviving.
Digital Infrastructure Becomes Revenue Target
Beyond maritime commerce, Tehran is also focusing on the underwater telecommunications cables traversing beneath the strait. These fiber-optic lines transmit internet traffic and financial information connecting Europe, Asia, and the Persian Gulf region.
Iranian military spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaghari announced via social media that Iran intends to “impose fees on internet cables.” Government-linked media indicated that corporations such as Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon would need to adhere to Iranian regulations, with submarine cable operators required to remit licensing payments.
Under the proposed framework, maintenance and repair authorization would be granted solely to Iranian companies.
How Iran might enforce such compliance remains uncertain. U.S. economic sanctions forbid these corporations from conducting financial transactions with Iran, and certain experts suggest these declarations may constitute strategic messaging rather than actionable policy.
Nevertheless, government-affiliated media sources have issued warnings about possible cable infrastructure damage. Researcher Mostafa Ahmed cautioned that any assault could precipitate a “cascading digital catastrophe” impacting banking infrastructure, military communications networks, and internet availability spanning multiple continents.
According to telecommunications research organization TeleGeography, two cables—Falcon and Gulf Bridge International—do traverse Iranian territorial waters. The same organization observed, however, that cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz represent less than 1% of worldwide international bandwidth capacity as of 2025.
Iran has drawn parallels between its strategy and Egypt’s utilization of the Suez Canal to generate hundreds of millions annually in cable transit revenue, though legal scholars point out the two waterways function under distinct international legal structures.


