Key Points
- Cole County has become the battleground for two legal challenges against Attorney General Catherine Hanaway’s enforcement actions targeting “pre-reveal” gaming terminals.
- Tuners Bar & Grill contends these devices fall outside Missouri’s gambling statutes and is pursuing class-action certification.
- The Missouri Licensing Advocacy Group alleges state regulators leverage liquor licensing powers to circumvent judicial review and compel device removal.
- These legal actions stem from a February federal court decision against Torch Electronics, prompting the company to cease Missouri operations by April.
- According to Hanaway, aggressive enforcement measures have reduced unregulated gaming terminals from approximately 25,000 units to about 7,000.
A significant legal confrontation is unfolding in Missouri as the state’s crackdown on unregulated gaming terminals faces coordinated resistance. This summer brought two distinct legal challenges filed in Cole County court.
Each case takes aim at Attorney General Catherine Hanaway’s aggressive enforcement initiative. The plaintiffs contend she has exceeded her constitutional authority.
At the heart of the controversy are gaming terminals marketed as “pre-reveal” or “no-chance” machines. These devices display results to users before they commit to playing a round.
Operators maintain this distinctive characteristic places the machines outside Missouri’s gambling prohibitions. They insist the state legislature has never enacted specific legislation outlawing such devices.
Tuners’ Legal Arguments
Tuners Bar & Grill, located in St. Charles, initiated the first legal challenge. The establishment seeks class-action certification to represent additional businesses operating comparable gaming terminals.
The legal filing asserts that defining illegal gambling activities remains exclusively within the legislature’s jurisdiction. According to the complaint, the Attorney General lacks authority to establish new prohibitions through enforcement actions alone.
Tuners further contends that exposure to criminal prosecution without definitive judicial guidance threatens irreparable damage. Potential consequences include criminal records, equipment confiscation, and destroyed business partnerships.
The legal petition requests judicial determination that Missouri’s existing gambling statutes provide insufficient clarity regarding these specific gaming devices.
Licensing Threats Drive Second Legal Challenge
The Missouri Licensing Advocacy Group, abbreviated as MOLAG, filed the companion lawsuit. The organization represents alcohol distributors, tavern owners, and retail establishments.
MOLAG’s complaint adopts a distinct legal strategy. It maintains that state authorities improperly leverage liquor licensing powers to coerce gaming device removal without awaiting judicial determination.
The advocacy group contends Missouri’s alcohol regulatory agency possesses jurisdiction solely over beverage licensing matters. According to MOLAG, this authority provides no basis for determining gaming equipment legality.
MOLAG emphasizes that Missouri’s legislature has considered gaming device legislation repeatedly across multiple sessions without enacting new laws. The organization argues this legislative inaction demonstrates the matter remains legally unsettled.
The two lawsuits arrived within approximately seven days of each other, filed on June 18 and June 26 respectively. They constitute the first organized legal resistance to Hanaway’s enforcement campaign.
The current controversy originated with a February federal court determination that machines operated by Torch Electronics constituted illegal gambling devices. Following that judicial decision, Hanaway’s office notified Torch that continued state operations could trigger criminal prosecution.
By April, Torch had ceased all Missouri business activities. Hanaway characterized this withdrawal as validation that existing law already prohibited the machines.
In a recent St. Louis Magazine interview, she reported enforcement efforts have decreased the number of machines operating statewide from a maximum of approximately 25,000 units to roughly 7,000.
Missouri’s situation reflects broader regional conflicts. Tennessee courts ruled against Torch’s “No Chance Games” in July 2025 based on comparable legal reasoning.
Additionally, Pennsylvania’s highest court recently determined that Pace-O-Matic’s Pennsylvania Skill gaming terminals qualify as slot machines under that jurisdiction’s gaming regulations. Both Missouri cases remain under consideration in Cole County court.
Get 3 Free Stock Ebooks
Discover top-performing stocks in AI, Crypto, and Technology with expert analysis.
- Top 10 AI Stocks - Leading AI companies
- Top 10 Crypto Stocks - Blockchain leaders
- Top 10 Tech Stocks - Tech giants
