Key Findings
- A recent US study shows 79% of prediction market participants experienced financial losses over the past year
- More than a quarter lost $500 or more, while 9% saw losses exceeding $1,000
- Half of all users relied on borrowed money, including credit cards and personal loans, to fund their bets
- Borrowers faced an 88% loss rate compared to 69% among those using their own funds
- Over half of participants joined these platforms seeking additional income rather than entertainment
A startling new survey reveals that approximately 80% of prediction market participants experienced financial setbacks over the past year, with more than half financing their trading activities through borrowed capital.
The research was conducted by BadCredit.org, polling 1,000 American adults. Results showed that 15% had participated on platforms including Kalshi, Polymarket, or PredictIt.
Within this active user segment, 79% acknowledged suffering losses throughout the previous 12 months. Over 27% experienced losses surpassing $500, while 9% reported setbacks exceeding the $1,000 threshold. Just 21% managed to avoid losses entirely.
Debt-Fueled Trading Shows Significantly Worse Outcomes
Users who financed their trading through debt experienced substantially higher loss rates. Among the 51% who utilized credit cards, personal loans, or alternative borrowed funds, 88% reported negative outcomes.
This figure stands in sharp contrast to the 69% loss rate observed among participants who traded exclusively with their own capital.
Consumer finance authority Erica Sandberg cautioned that leveraging debt for speculative trading compounds risk by adding interest obligations to already unpredictable results. These borrowers face ongoing repayment requirements even after their initial investment is lost.
“Although tempting, borrowing money to place a bet is a universally bad idea,” Sandberg said.
It’s important to note that the survey depended on participant self-reporting and did not cross-reference responses with actual platform transaction data.
Financial Motivation Drives Platform Adoption
Economic necessity emerged as the primary driver behind prediction market participation.
Nearly half (44%) indicated they sought supplementary income, while another 9% reported facing financial hardship. Combined, 53% cited financially motivated reasons for their participation.
This significantly outweighed the 27% who participated purely for recreational purposes or intellectual curiosity.
Looking at the broader survey population, 30% expressed belief that prediction markets could meaningfully enhance their economic circumstances. This optimism was notably gender-skewed, with 37% of men holding this view versus only 25% of women.
Participation rates also showed gender disparity. Approximately 24% of male respondents reported using prediction market platforms, while only 9% of women had done so.
Independent academic analysis has demonstrated that trading profits are highly concentrated. Research examining 1.72 million Polymarket accounts revealed that fewer than 3.5% of users captured over 30% of all platform gains.
Industry Booms Amid Mounting Regulatory Attention
These concerning loss statistics emerge against a backdrop of unprecedented trading activity.
Major platforms Kalshi, Polymarket, and Polymarket US collectively processed $50.59 billion in trading volume during July, representing a 7.8% increase from the previous month.
Kalshi dominated with $37.7 billion in volume. Polymarket’s domestic and international operations together accounted for $12.9 billion.
These numbers represent notional trading volume rather than actual customer deposits or confirmed losses.
The sector’s explosive growth has attracted increasing regulatory scrutiny. While the Commodity Futures Trading Commission maintains oversight of federally registered platforms, multiple state governments contend that sports-related contracts fall under local gambling licensing requirements.
This past July, the US House Agriculture Committee convened a hearing specifically addressing consumer protection concerns and market integrity standards.
Additionally, the CFTC issued guidance discouraging platforms from displaying contracts using American-style gambling odds notation.


