Key Points
- CEO Simon Gerovich clarified that Metaplanet transferred 5,014 BTC ($322M) internally between custodial wallets rather than selling
- The company’s Bitcoin treasury stands firm at 43,000 BTC after the wallet movements
- The Japanese firm paid approximately $8 in network fees to transfer $322 million worth of Bitcoin
- Ranked third globally among public companies holding Bitcoin, trailing Strategy and Twenty One Capital
- Metaplanet aims to accumulate 100,000 BTC by late 2026 and 210,000 BTC by late 2027
On August 13, Metaplanet’s CEO Simon Gerovich moved quickly to quash rumors suggesting the Japanese Bitcoin treasury firm had offloaded a significant portion of its digital asset reserves.
“This was a routine custody operation. No bitcoin was sold, and our holdings remain 43,000 BTC,” Gerovich clarified.
His response followed blockchain surveillance reports that identified substantial wallet activity connected to Metaplanet during a 24-hour window. Lookonchain detected 3,881 BTC exiting addresses associated with the firm, representing approximately $247 million in value.
The CEO subsequently disclosed that the actual amount transferred reached 5,014 BTC, valued at approximately $322 million. He emphasized that every satoshi moved between wallets under Metaplanet’s direct custody control.
Notably, transferring $322 million in Bitcoin required only about $8 in blockchain transaction fees.
What Triggered the Market Speculation
Substantial Bitcoin movements from identified corporate wallets typically generate immediate scrutiny within cryptocurrency circles. Since Metaplanet discloses its wallet addresses publicly, these transactions became instantly visible to blockchain observers worldwide.
However, wallet transfers don’t necessarily indicate asset liquidation. Bitcoin frequently moves among cold storage solutions, third-party custodians, or different corporate-controlled addresses without any ownership changes. Wednesday’s blockchain activity revealed destination addresses but provided no evidence of fiat currency conversion.
Similar situations have occurred before with Metaplanet. In March, the company relocated approximately 4,986 BTC valued at roughly $368 million following an extended period of wallet dormancy. That transfer also turned out to involve no actual sales.
As of August 13, Metaplanet’s regulatory disclosures contained no Bitcoin disposal announcements. The company’s most recent filing was dated August 10 and addressed an extraordinary shareholder assembly. Its last Bitcoin acquisition filing carried a July 2 date.
Metaplanet’s Current Position
With 43,000 BTC in its treasury, Metaplanet occupies the third position worldwide among publicly traded corporations by Bitcoin holdings. Strategy commands the top spot with 840,447 BTC, while Twenty One Capital holds second place with 43,514 BTC. Metaplanet trails Twenty One Capital by merely 514 BTC.
Bitcoin traded around $63,616 on August 13, falling short of Metaplanet’s disclosed average purchase price of approximately $96,191 per coin. Lookonchain calculated the firm was holding roughly $1.4 billion in paper losses at current market valuations. These represent unrealized losses on accounting statements, as no actual liquidation occurred.
Metaplanet’s stock price stood at approximately 223 yen at 1:14 p.m. Japan Standard Time, reflecting a modest 0.9% increase for the trading session. The CEO’s statement caused no significant negative market response.
While the company’s primary listing remains on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, American investors can access shares through OTCQX markets under ticker symbol MTPLF.
To reach its stated objective of 100,000 BTC by the conclusion of 2026, Metaplanet must acquire approximately 57,000 additional Bitcoin. The firm’s most recent verified purchase occurred in July, when it expanded total reserves to 43,000 BTC after acquiring 2,823 BTC during the second quarter.
Beyond treasury accumulation, Metaplanet unveiled a 4 billion yen Bitcoin venture program in March focused on developing financial infrastructure throughout Japan. As of August 13, Gerovich’s explanation remains the sole official account of the recent transfer: a standard custody procedure with zero impact on treasury balances.


