TLDR
- President Trump ridiculed short sellers during a White House event, saying they were getting “wiped out” in the current rally.
- Michael Burry, famous for forecasting the 2008 financial crisis, responded with criticism of Trump’s understanding of investment strategies.
- Burry defended short selling as an essential market mechanism despite its inherent risks.
- The investor argues Trump’s approach to Iran is dictated by concerns over market volatility.
- Brent crude surged past $126 per barrel during heightened tensions before retreating to approximately pre-conflict levels.
During a Monday White House gathering celebrating the debut of Trump Accounts, President Donald Trump took aim at short sellers. He remarked that a “couple of guys” betting against market growth were facing serious losses and “being wiped out.”
Trump added that he holds negative views toward short sellers because their positions amount to wagering against America’s success.
Michael Burry, the hedge fund manager who gained fame for correctly predicting the 2008 mortgage crisis, fired back on social media. His response suggested that while Trump might struggle to grasp his investment approach, the president excels at profiting from his political position.
Burry has since removed the post from his social media presence.
Burry Stands Behind Short Selling Practices
Burry now operates a Substack publication focused on investment commentary. He has transitioned from active hedge fund management to sharing his market perspectives through online platforms.
In his rebuttal, Burry stated that short sellers’ primary error lies in overestimating others’ intelligence. He characterized short selling as a high-risk activity with capped profit potential and the possibility of rapid capital erosion.
Burry clarified that his investment approach maintains predominantly long positions throughout most periods. He increases cash holdings when valuations appear stretched, then seeks opportunities during subsequent market corrections.
A White House representative countered Burry’s statements, noting the investor has made multiple unsuccessful market crash predictions and questioning his professional reputation.
Burry Links Trump’s Iran Strategy to Market Concerns
In a separate analysis, Burry has connected Trump’s handling of the Iran situation to equity market movements. In a March Substack essay, Burry identified the stock market as Trump’s Achilles’ heel.
He contended that Trump’s Iran policy essentially boils down to attempting conflict resolution before significant market deterioration occurs.
Following the June peace agreement announcement, Burry maintained that Trump’s policy choices consistently align with this framework. He referenced previous tariff policy reversals that coincided with substantial market recoveries.
Burry further speculated that the peace agreement might gradually result in Iranian sanctions relief. He suggested this approach represents a shift toward reducing geopolitical friction through economic expansion instead of coercive measures.
Oil prices mirrored the conflict’s trajectory. Brent crude climbed above $126 per barrel during peak hostilities.
Prices declined following ceasefire implementation and the restoration of Strait of Hormuz shipping lanes. By June 30, Brent crude was trading around $73 per barrel, approaching February pre-war price levels.
The S&P 500 experienced similar volatility during this timeframe. The index initially crossed 7,000 points in January, propelled primarily by artificial intelligence sector enthusiasm.
By late March, the index had fallen to its annual nadir. It has subsequently recovered, hovering near 7,537 points at the beginning of July.
Reports have surfaced regarding substantial trades executed immediately before Trump moderated his position on potential Iran strikes. The White House has categorically rejected any connection between trading activity and war-related policy decisions.
Burry declined to provide comment when contacted regarding his recent statements.


